Ahmmad v. Wells Fargo Bank

Full title: ABDU AHMMAD, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, NA, Defendant.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Sep 9, 2014

Civil Action No. 3:13-CV-5019-N-BH (N.D. Tex. Sep. 9, 2014)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:13-CV-5019-N-BH

09-09-2014

ABDU AHMMAD, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, NA, Defendant.

DAVID C. GODBEY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Referred to U.S. Magistrate Judge

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court.

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject-Matter Jurisdiction, filed February 19, 2014 (doc. 8), is GRANTED, and its alternative Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can be Granted, Application to Compel Arbitration, Plea in Abatement, and Motion to Stay Suit Pending Arbitration are DENIED as moot. By separate judgment, all of Plaintiff's claims against Defendant will be DISMISSED without prejudice.

SIGNED this 9^th day of September, 2014.

/s/_________

DAVID C. GODBEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE