From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ahmed v. State of Washington

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jun 18, 2002
294 F.3d 1092 (9th Cir. 2002)

Summary

criticizing the majority for undertaking a "quantum expansion" of the doctrine

Summary of this case from Rogers v. Swepston

Opinion

No. 00-35660.

June 18, 2002.

Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, NOONAN, O'SCANNLAIN, TROTT, Rymer, KLEINFELD, HAWKINS, TASHIMA, FISHER, TALLMAN, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, the appeal is DISMISSED with each party to bear its own costs. The panel opinion is VACATED.


Summaries of

Ahmed v. State of Washington

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jun 18, 2002
294 F.3d 1092 (9th Cir. 2002)

criticizing the majority for undertaking a "quantum expansion" of the doctrine

Summary of this case from Rogers v. Swepston
Case details for

Ahmed v. State of Washington

Case Details

Full title:Tariq AHMED, MD, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. State of WASHINGTON, DEPARTMENT OF…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jun 18, 2002

Citations

294 F.3d 1092 (9th Cir. 2002)

Citing Cases

Rogers v. Swepston

Some respected jurists, along with a few commentators, have decried the doctrine's ever-expanding reach in…