From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ahmed v. Kalahari Resorts & Conventions - Poconos

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Nov 7, 2024
3:24cv851 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 7, 2024)

Opinion

3:24cv851

11-07-2024

IMRAN AHMED, Plaintiff v. KALAHARI RESORTS & CONVENTIONS - POCONOS; KALAHARI RESORTS PA, LLC; and KALAHARI RESORTS, LLC, Defendants


ORDER

MUNLEY, JUDGE

AND NOW, to wit, this 7th day of November 2024, the motion to dismiss or in the alternative motion for a more definite statement (Doc. 10) is hereby GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. It is granted with respect to the motion for a more definite statement. The plaintiff is directed to file an amened complaint within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this order which specifies the location of the steps at issue. The amended complaint should also properly allege the citizenship of the parties and remedy the discrepancy regarding whether the waterpark is located in New Jersey or Pennsylvania. The motion is DENIED in all other respects.


Summaries of

Ahmed v. Kalahari Resorts & Conventions - Poconos

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Nov 7, 2024
3:24cv851 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 7, 2024)
Case details for

Ahmed v. Kalahari Resorts & Conventions - Poconos

Case Details

Full title:IMRAN AHMED, Plaintiff v. KALAHARI RESORTS & CONVENTIONS - POCONOS…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania

Date published: Nov 7, 2024

Citations

3:24cv851 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 7, 2024)