From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

A.H. v. United States Dist. Court for the E. Dist. of Cal. Scramento (In re A.H.)

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 17, 2022
No. 22-70019 (9th Cir. Mar. 17, 2022)

Opinion

22-70019

03-17-2022

In re: A.H., a minor; et al. v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO, Respondent, A.H., a minor; et al., Petitioners, ELK GROVE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT; et al., Real Parties in Interest.


Eastern District of California, Sacramento D.C. No. 2:21-cv-00690-KJM-JDP

Before: TASHIMA, FRIEDLAND, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Petitioners have not demonstrated that this case warrants the intervention of this court by means of the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See Bauman v. U.S. Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). Accordingly, the petition is denied.

DENIED.


Summaries of

A.H. v. United States Dist. Court for the E. Dist. of Cal. Scramento (In re A.H.)

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 17, 2022
No. 22-70019 (9th Cir. Mar. 17, 2022)
Case details for

A.H. v. United States Dist. Court for the E. Dist. of Cal. Scramento (In re A.H.)

Case Details

Full title:In re: A.H., a minor; et al. v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Mar 17, 2022

Citations

No. 22-70019 (9th Cir. Mar. 17, 2022)