From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Agwara v. Christensen

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Sep 8, 2015
No. 66836 (Nev. Sep. 8, 2015)

Opinion

No. 66836

09-08-2015

LIBORIOUS AGWARA, ESQ., Appellant, v. EGLET WALL CHRISTENSEN; AND UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER OF SOUTHERN NEVADA, Respondents.


An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND DISMISSING APPEAL

This is an appeal from a district court order dispersing funds in an action for interpleader and declaratory relief. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Nancy L. Allf, Judge. When our preliminary review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) revealed a potential jurisdictional defect, we ordered appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Appellant has submitted an untimely response to our order as well as a motion to extend time to file the response. In support of the request for an extension of time, appellant's counsel states that he did not have an email address registered for electronic service in this case and did not receive a copy of the order to show cause by mail. As a registered user of this court's electronic filing system, it was counsel's responsibility to ensure that this court had the correct electronic mail address. NEFCR 13(c). Nevertheless, we grant the motion. NRAP 26(b)(1)(A). The clerk shall detach the response to order to show cause from the motion filed on August 5, 2015, and file it separately.

In our order to show cause, we noted that it did not appear that the district court had entered a final written judgment adjudicating all the rights and liabilities of all the parties, and the district court did not certify its order as final. Thus, it did not appear that the challenged order was appealable pursuant to NRAP 3A(b)(1). See Lee v. GNLV Corp., 116 Nev. 424, 426, 996 P.2d 416, 417 (2000). In response, appellant agrees that the rights and liabilities of all the parties were not adjudicated by the district court. Accordingly, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction over this appeal, and we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

Appellant's requests to remand this matter to the district court, waive any future filing fees, and dismiss this appeal without prejudice are denied. --------

/s/_________, J.

Saitta
/s/_________, J.
Gibbons
/s/_________, J.
Pickering
cc: Hon. Nancy L. Allf, District Judge

Agwara & Associates

Eglet Prince

Weller Law

Clark County District Attorney/Civil Division

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Agwara v. Christensen

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Sep 8, 2015
No. 66836 (Nev. Sep. 8, 2015)
Case details for

Agwara v. Christensen

Case Details

Full title:LIBORIOUS AGWARA, ESQ., Appellant, v. EGLET WALL CHRISTENSEN; AND…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Sep 8, 2015

Citations

No. 66836 (Nev. Sep. 8, 2015)