From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Agusto v. MGM Resorts

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Nov 21, 2019
3:19-cv-00604-MMD-CLB (D. Nev. Nov. 21, 2019)

Opinion

3:19-cv-00604-MMD-CLB

11-21-2019

JOSE AGUSTO, Plaintiff, v. MGM RESORTS, Defendant.


ORDER

I. DISCUSSION

Plaintiff, who is an inmate in the custody of the Nevada Department of Corrections, has submitted a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1-1). Additionally, Plaintiff has submitted an incomplete application to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 1).

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2) and Local Rule LSR 1-2, Plaintiff must complete an application to proceed in forma pauperis and attach both an inmate account statement for the past six months and a properly executed financial certificate. The Court will retain Plaintiff's civil rights complaint (ECF No. 1-1), but will not file it until the matter of the payment of the filing fee is resolved. Plaintiff will be granted an opportunity to file a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis, or in the alternative, pay the full filing fee for this action. If Plaintiff fails to submit a fully complete application to proceed in forma pauperis, or pay the full filing fee, the court will recommend that this action be dismissed.

II. CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court SHALL SEND Plaintiff the approved form application to proceed in forma pauperis by a prisoner, as well as the document entitled information and instructions for filing an in forma pauperis application.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, Plaintiff shall either: (1) file a fully complete application to proceed in forma pauperis, on the correct form with complete financial attachments in compliance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a); or (2) pay the full $400 fee for filing a civil action (which includes the $350 filing fee and the $50 administrative fee).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff does not timely comply with this order, the court will enter a report and recommendation to dismiss this action.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall retain the complaint (ECF No. 1-1), but shall not file it at this time.

DATED: November 21, 2019.

/s/ _________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Agusto v. MGM Resorts

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Nov 21, 2019
3:19-cv-00604-MMD-CLB (D. Nev. Nov. 21, 2019)
Case details for

Agusto v. MGM Resorts

Case Details

Full title:JOSE AGUSTO, Plaintiff, v. MGM RESORTS, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Nov 21, 2019

Citations

3:19-cv-00604-MMD-CLB (D. Nev. Nov. 21, 2019)