Opinion
No. 07-72702.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).
Filed April 29, 2008.
Martin A. Robles, Esq., Law Offices of Martin Resendez Guajardo, A Professional Corporation, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioners.
Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, San Francisco, CA, OIL, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Agency Nos. A75-306-762, A75-4306-763, A75-306-766.
Before: GRABER, FISHER, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Ricardo Aguilar-Varillas, and his two daughters, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' denial, as untimely filed, of their motion to reopen or reconsider removal proceedings.
Petitioners fail to raise any arguments regarding whether the BIA erred in finding that their motion to reopen or reconsider was untimely, whether equitable tolling is applicable, and whether the BIA erred in refusing to reopen sua sponte. Petitioners, therefore, have waived any challenge to the BIA's decision denying their motion. See Martimz-Serrano) v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir. 1996).