From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Aguilar v. Town of Center

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Sep 21, 2012
Civil Case No. 12-cv-01347-MSK-BNB (D. Colo. Sep. 21, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Case No. 12-cv-01347-MSK-BNB

09-21-2012

JAIME AGUILAR; MARIBEL AGUILAR; MONSERRATE AGUILAR; ROGELIO AGUILAR, Plaintiffs, v. TOWN OF CENTER, a colorado municipal corporation, and CARLOS HEREDIA, individually and in his official capacity as a police officer for the Town of Center, and LEROY TORRES, individually and in his official capacity as a chief of police for the Town of Center Defendants.


STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

The Parties to this action, their counsel, and any other person who agrees in writing to be bound by the terms of this protective order ("Order"), are bound by this Order.

Having shown good cause in support of the entry of Order to protect against the dissemination of the confidential information set forth herein, and recognizing the Parties to this case have stipulated hereto, IT IS ORDERED:

1. This Protective Order shall apply to all documents, materials and information, including without limitation, documents produced, answers to interrogatories, responses to requests for admission, deposition testimony and other information disclosed pursuant to the disclosure or discovery duties created by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

2. As used in this Protective Order, "document" is defined as provided in Fed. R.Civ.P.34(a). A draft or non-identical copy is a separate document within the meaning of this term.

3. Information designated as CONFIDENTIAL shall first be reviewed by a lawyer and the designation of information as CONFIDENTIAL must be based on a good faith belief that the information is confidential, implicates common law or statutory privacy interests, or is otherwise entitled to protection under Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(c). Information designated "CONFIDENTIAL" shall be any information that is designated as sensitive by the disclosing party including, but not limited to, printed documents, computer disks or other electronic media, information contained in documents or electronic media, information revealed during depositions, and information revealed in interrogatory answers. In general, CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION includes and may be claimed with respect to information which is confidential or proprietary in nature, such as, but not limited to, trade secrets, research and development, customer lists or other commercial information that has been kept confidential by the producing party, personnel information or documents, medical information pertaining to employees, internal investigation files, records of criminal matters, as well as any information that implicates a common law or statutory privacy interest such as personal identifying information or any other information that is otherwise entitled to protection under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c)(1).

4. This CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION shall not be disclosed or used for any purpose except the preparation and trial of this case.

5. The CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION shall not, without the consent of the party producing it or further Order of the Court, be disclosed except that such information may be disclosed to:

a) attorneys actively working on this case;

b) persons regularly employed or associated with the attorneys actively working on the case whose assistance is required by said attorneys in the preparation for trial, or at trial, or at other proceedings in this case;

c) the parties;

d) expert witnesses and consultants retained in connection with this proceeding, to the extent such disclosure is necessary for preparation, trial or other proceedings in this case;

e) the Court and its employees ("Court Personnel");

f) stenographic reporters who are engaged in proceedings necessarily incident to the conduct of this action;

g) deponents or witnesses; and

h) other persons by written agreement of the parties.

6. Prior to disclosing any CONFIDENTIAL information to any person listed above (other than counsel, persons employed by counsel, Court Personnel, and stenographic reporters), counsel shall provide such person with a copy of this Protective Order and obtain from such person a written acknowledgement stating that he or she has read this Protective Order and agrees to be bound by its provisions. All such acknowledgments shall be retained by counsel and shall be subject to in camera review by the Court if good cause for review is demonstrated by opposing counsel.

7. Documents are designated as CONFIDENTIAL by placing or affixing on them (in a manner that will not interfere with their legibility) the following or other appropriate notice: "CONFIDENTIAL."

8. Whenever a deposition involves the disclosure of said CONFIDENTIAL information, the deposition or portions thereof shall, at the election of counsel, be designated as CONFIDENTIAL and shall be subject to the provisions of this Protective Order. Such designation shall be made on the record during the deposition whenever possible, but a party may designate portions of depositions as CONFIDENTIAL after transcription, provided written notice of the designation is promptly given to all counsel of record within thirty (30) days after notice by the court reporter of the completion of the transcript.

9. A party may object to the designation of particular CONFIDENTIAL information by giving written notice to the party designating the disputed information. The written notice shall identify the information to which the objection is made. If the parties cannot resolve the objection within ten (10) business days after the time the notice is received, it shall be the obligation of the party designating the information as CONFIDENTIAL to file an appropriate motion requesting that the Court determine whether the disputed information should be subject to the terms of this Protective Order. If such a motion is timely filed, the disputed information shall be treated as CONFIDENTIAL under the terms of this Protective Order until the Court rules on the motion. If the designating party fails to file such a motion within the prescribed time, the disputed information shall lose its designation as CONFIDENTIAL and shall not thereafter be treated as CONFIDENTIAL in accordance with this Protective Order. In connection with a motion filed under this provision, the party designating the information as CONFIDENTIAL shall bear the burden of establishing that good cause exists for the disputed information to be treated as CONFIDENTIAL.

10. Any request to restrict access to materials filed with the Court must comply with D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.2. In the event the Parties seek to file CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION, they shall comply in all respects with D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.2.

11. This Protective Order may be modified by the Court at any time for good cause shown following notice to all parties and an opportunity for them to be heard.

BY THE COURT:

Boyd N. Boland

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Aguilar v. Town of Center

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Sep 21, 2012
Civil Case No. 12-cv-01347-MSK-BNB (D. Colo. Sep. 21, 2012)
Case details for

Aguilar v. Town of Center

Case Details

Full title:JAIME AGUILAR; MARIBEL AGUILAR; MONSERRATE AGUILAR; ROGELIO AGUILAR…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Sep 21, 2012

Citations

Civil Case No. 12-cv-01347-MSK-BNB (D. Colo. Sep. 21, 2012)