Opinion
Submitted October term, 1930.
Decided February 2d 1931.
On appeal from the court of chancery.
Messrs. Cook Stout, for the appellant.
Mr. Ward Kremer, for the respondent.
The appellant was the petitioner in the court below seeking a divorce on the ground of extreme cruelty. The bill was dismissed and the present appeal resulted.
Our examination of the case and of the grounds of appeal discloses that a question of fact only was presented by the proofs, and we cannot say that the conclusion reached by the learned vice-chancellor was erroneous.
The decree is affirmed.
For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DALY, DONGES, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.