From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Agricultural Company v. Pierce County

U.S.
Jan 1, 1867
73 U.S. 246 (1867)

Opinion

DECEMBER TERM, 1867.

A writ of error made returnable to a day different from the return day fixed by statute as the day on which the term commences, dismissed.

Messrs. Lander and Carlisle, for the plaintiff in error; no opposite counsel appearing nor having entered their appearance of record.


ERROR to the Supreme Court of Washington Territory.

The writ of error bore date January 20th, 1862. It was on its face made returnable on the second Monday of December next after its date, when it should have been the first Monday of that month, which is by law the day on which the terms of this court commence each year.

For this cause (Mr. Justice MILLER, announcing the order), the writ of error was dismissed under the authority of the cases of Carroll v. Dorsey, Insurance Company v. Mordecai, and Porter v. Foley, heretofore decided by this court.

Page 246 20 Howard, 204.

Page 246 21 Id. 195.

Id. 393.


Summaries of

Agricultural Company v. Pierce County

U.S.
Jan 1, 1867
73 U.S. 246 (1867)
Case details for

Agricultural Company v. Pierce County

Case Details

Full title:AGRICULTURAL COMPANY v . PIERCE COUNTY

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jan 1, 1867

Citations

73 U.S. 246 (1867)

Citing Cases

ATHERTON ET AL. v. FOWLER ET AL

Gelston v. Hoyt, 3 Wheat. 304; Webster v. Reid, 11 How. 457; Miller v. Joseph, 17 Wall. 655; McGuire v. The…