From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Agostino v. Pennysaver Group, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 11, 2001
284 A.D.2d 353 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Submitted May 16, 2001

June 11, 2001

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Cowhey, J.), dated September 7, 2000, which granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Bleakley Platt Schmidt, LLP, White Plains, N.Y. (Matthew G. Parisi of counsel), for appellant.

Steve S. Efron, New York, N.Y., for respondent.

Before: CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, STEPHEN G. CRANE, JJ.


ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant established its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. In opposing the defendant's motion, the plaintiff failed to raise an issue of fact as to whether the defendant's employee was acting within the scope of employment when the employee's vehicle struck her (see, Lundberg v. State of New York, 25 N.Y.2d 467; Donitz v. Mui, 247 A.D.2d 508; Howard v. Hilton, 244 A.D.2d 912; Casimiro v. Thayer, 229 A.D.2d 958).


Summaries of

Agostino v. Pennysaver Group, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 11, 2001
284 A.D.2d 353 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Agostino v. Pennysaver Group, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:PATRICIA A. AGOSTINO, APPELLANT, v. PENNYSAVER GROUP, INC., RESPONDENT

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 11, 2001

Citations

284 A.D.2d 353 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
725 N.Y.S.2d 900

Citing Cases

Xin Tang Wu v. Ng

mployee was acting solely for personal motives unrelated to the furtherance of the employer's business ( see…

Schilt v. N.Y.C. Transit Authority

271 A.D.2d 296, 298). Regardless of the manner in which the rule is phrased, however, "an employee's actions…