From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Agnew v. State

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
Jun 25, 2019
NUMBER 13-18-00013-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 25, 2019)

Opinion

NUMBER 13-18-00013-CR

06-25-2019

MATTHEW PATRICK AGNEW, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.


On appeal from the 36th District Court of San Patricio County, Texas.

ORDER

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Longoria
Order Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court on the record and appellant's amended brief. Appellant's court appointed appellate counsel filed an amended Anders brief with this Court on September 10, 2018. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Upon review of counsel's Anders brief, we note the brief contains numerous formal and substantive defects, the brief does not meet Anders requirements, and the case has not been properly presented. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.9. The brief here "does not refer us to anything in this cold record which might arguably support the appeal; it does not discuss any of the evidence adduced at trial; it does not supply us with ready references to the record, nor does it supply us with any citation to legal authorities." High v. State, 573 S.W.3d 807, 812 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); see In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403, 407 n.9 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008) (orig. proceeding). An Ander's brief should present a thorough, professional evaluation of the record showing why there are no arguable grounds for advancing an appeal. See High, 573 S.W.3d at 812; Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 n.3 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).

Accordingly, under the authority of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.9(a) and (b), we STRIKE appellant's brief and ABATE this matter to allow counsel to redraw the brief. Appellant is hereby ORDERED to file an amended brief with this Court that complies with the above rules within fifteen days from the date of this order. In accordance with Rule 38.1, the facts pertinent to the appeal and the issues and argument presented in the brief must be clear and concise, and the brief must be supported by record references.

If counsel files an amended brief that fails to comply with this order of the Court, the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, and the Anders guidelines, then the Court will abate the appeal for appointment of new appellate counsel. See id. 38.9(a). We must proceed as necessary to protect appellant's rights on appeal and to obtain a satisfactory submission of the case. This appeal will be reinstated upon the expiration of fifteen days from the date of this order, or the date that appellant's amended brief is filed, whichever occurs first.

It is so ordered.

PER CURIAM Do not publish.
TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). Delivered and filed the 25th day of June, 2019.


Summaries of

Agnew v. State

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
Jun 25, 2019
NUMBER 13-18-00013-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 25, 2019)
Case details for

Agnew v. State

Case Details

Full title:MATTHEW PATRICK AGNEW, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

Date published: Jun 25, 2019

Citations

NUMBER 13-18-00013-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 25, 2019)