From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Agnes v. Joseph

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 23, 2011
CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00807-OWW-GBC (PC) (E.D. Cal. May. 23, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00807-OWW-GBC (PC).

May 23, 2011


ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS FOUND TO BE NOT COGNIZABLE, AND DEFENDANTS ASSOCIATED WITH SUCH CLAIMS


ORDER

Mark Agnes ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this action on May 10, 2010. (ECF No. 1.) Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, the Court screened Plaintiff's Complaint on April 28, 2011, and found that Plaintiff only stated cognizable claims against Defendants Joseph and Dixon for violations under the Eighth Amendment. (ECF No. 11.) The Court ordered Plaintiff to either cure the deficiencies highlighted in his Complaint through another amendment or notify the Court of his willingness to proceed on the cognizable claims. (Id.) On May 17, 2011, Plaintiff gave notice of his willingness to proceed on the cognizable deliberate indifference to a serious medical need claim against Defendants Joseph and Dixon. (ECF No. 12.)

For the reasons stated above, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Action to proceed on Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to serious medical need claim against Defendants Joseph and Dixon;
2. All claims, other than the Eighth Amendment Claim against Defendants Joseph and Dixon, are DISMISSED; and
3. Defendants Aye and Wasco State Prison Medical Service are DISMISSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 20, 2011


Summaries of

Agnes v. Joseph

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 23, 2011
CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00807-OWW-GBC (PC) (E.D. Cal. May. 23, 2011)
Case details for

Agnes v. Joseph

Case Details

Full title:MARK AGNES, Plaintiff, v. NURSE JOSEPH, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 23, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00807-OWW-GBC (PC) (E.D. Cal. May. 23, 2011)