From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Agins v. Darmstadter

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 27, 2000
278 A.D.2d 439 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted December 6, 2000.

December 27, 2000.

In an action to recover damages for defamation, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Bucaria, J.), dated February 22, 2000, which denied her motion to vacate a prior order of the same court which dismissed the action and to restore the action to the trial calendar.

Barry A. Kamen, P.C., Stony Brook, N.Y., for appellant.

Hammill, O'Brien, Croutier, Dempsey Pender, P.C., Mineola, N Y (Anton Piotroski of counsel), for respondent.

Before: CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In order to vacate the dismissal in this case and restore the action to the trial calendar, it was necessary for the plaintiff to demonstrate the merits of the action, a reasonable excuse for the delay, the absence of an intent to abandon the matter, and the lack of prejudice to the nonmoving party (see, Civello v. Grossman, 192 A.D.2d 636). The plaintiff failed to satisfy the standard.


Summaries of

Agins v. Darmstadter

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 27, 2000
278 A.D.2d 439 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Agins v. Darmstadter

Case Details

Full title:DOROTHY AGINS, APPELLANT, v. EVELYN DARMSTADTER, RESPONDENT

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 27, 2000

Citations

278 A.D.2d 439 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
717 N.Y.S.2d 922