From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Agere Sys., Inc. v. Worthington Steel Co.

Superior Court of the State of Delaware
Sep 18, 2012
C.A. No. 11C-10-235-JRJ (Del. Super. Ct. Sep. 18, 2012)

Opinion

C.A. No. 11C-10-235-JRJ

09-18-2012

RE: Agere Systems, Inc., Cytec Industries, Inc., Ford Motor Company, SPS Technologies LLC, TI Group Automotive Systems, LLC v. Worthington Steel Company

Sean J. Bellew, Esq. Ballard Spahr LLP Theodore A. Kittala, Esq. Elliott Greenleaf



Judge
Sean J. Bellew, Esq.
Ballard Spahr LLP
Theodore A. Kittala, Esq.
Elliott Greenleaf
Dear Counsel:

The Court has carefully reviewed, many times, the briefing on the cross-motions for summary judgment and the relevant case law. The Court has been drafting an opinion and grappling (for the last two months) to ascertain the intent of the parties with respect to the meaning of "incurred" as that term is used in the definition of Future Costs contained in the Settlement Agreement.

Because there are genuine issues of material fact in dispute with regard to Worthington's defenses of unilateral and/or mutual mistake, the cross-motions for summary judgment are DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Very truly yours,

Jan R. Jurden

Judge
JRJ:mls cc: Prothonotary


Summaries of

Agere Sys., Inc. v. Worthington Steel Co.

Superior Court of the State of Delaware
Sep 18, 2012
C.A. No. 11C-10-235-JRJ (Del. Super. Ct. Sep. 18, 2012)
Case details for

Agere Sys., Inc. v. Worthington Steel Co.

Case Details

Full title:RE: Agere Systems, Inc., Cytec Industries, Inc., Ford Motor Company, SPS…

Court:Superior Court of the State of Delaware

Date published: Sep 18, 2012

Citations

C.A. No. 11C-10-235-JRJ (Del. Super. Ct. Sep. 18, 2012)