From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

AGEE v. DURRANCE

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 3, 2006
No. CIV S-06-0357 DFL KJM PS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-0357 DFL KJM PS.

August 3, 2006


ORDER


Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21). On May 26, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. No objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed May 26, 2006, are adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed with prejudice.


Summaries of

AGEE v. DURRANCE

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 3, 2006
No. CIV S-06-0357 DFL KJM PS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 2006)
Case details for

AGEE v. DURRANCE

Case Details

Full title:LAWRENCE AGEE, Plaintiff, v. JOHN DURRANCE, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 3, 2006

Citations

No. CIV S-06-0357 DFL KJM PS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 2006)