Opinion
14069-19S
03-01-2022
ORDER OF DISMISSAL AND DECISION
Peter J. Panuthos, Special Trial Judge.
This case was set on the calendar for the remote Trial Session of the Court at New York, New York, on February 22, 2022. On January 14, 2022, respondent filed with the Court a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution. When this case was called from the calendar on February 22, 2022, there was no appearance by or on behalf of petitioners. Respondent appeared and was heard on the Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution. After due consideration and for cause more fully appearing in the transcript of the proceeding, it is
ORDERED that respondent's Motion To Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution, filed January 14, 2022, is granted, and this case is dismissed for lack of prosecution. It is further
ORDERED AND DECIDED that there is a deficiency in income tax due from petitioners in the amount of $ 7, 477.00 for the 2016 taxable year; and
That there is no section 6662(a) accuracy-related penalty due from petitioners for the 2016 taxable year.
That there is no section 6662(a) accuracy-related penalty due from petitioners