From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Aetna Life Cas. v. Braccidiferro

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jan 10, 1995
651 A.2d 743 (Conn. 1995)

Opinion

(15038)

Decided January 10, 1995


The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 34 Conn. App. 833 (AC 11058), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant's claim was not a `final judgment' within the meaning of Public Acts 1993, No. 93-77?

"2. If the answer to question 1. is yes, did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the limitations period applicable to the defendant's claim is the three year period provided by Public Acts 1993, No. 93-77, rather than the six year contract limitations period?

"3. If the answer to question 2. is yes, did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the application of § 3 of Public Acts 1993, No. 93-77 to the facts of this case did not violate the plaintiff's rights under: (a) article first, § 1, of the Connecticut constitution; (b) article first, § 10, of the United States constitution; (c) the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment to the United States constitution; or (d) article first, § 10, of the Connecticut constitution?"


Michael P. Del Sole, in support of the petition.


Summaries of

Aetna Life Cas. v. Braccidiferro

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jan 10, 1995
651 A.2d 743 (Conn. 1995)
Case details for

Aetna Life Cas. v. Braccidiferro

Case Details

Full title:AETNA LIFE AND CASUALTY COMPANY v. MARIE BRACCIDIFERRO

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Jan 10, 1995

Citations

651 A.2d 743 (Conn. 1995)
232 Conn. 901

Citing Cases

Serrano v. Aetna Ins. Co.

Section 3 of P.A. 93-77 "was written to have a retroactive effect on the rights of the parties." Aetna Life…

Bayusik v. Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co.

We conclude, rather, that the plaintiff's claim is subject only to the six year statute of limitations…