From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Aetna Casualty Surety v. State Park Ins. A.

Appeals Court of Massachusetts
Dec 8, 1981
428 N.E.2d 376 (Mass. App. Ct. 1981)

Opinion

December 8, 1981.

Owen Gallagher, for the plaintiff, submitted a brief.


Because count four of the plaintiff's complaint was brought pursuant to G.L.c. 93A, § 11, there was no requirement of a thirty-day demand letter as required by G.L.c. 93A, § 9, Nader v. Citron, 372 Mass. 96, 99-101 (1977), and the judge committed error in dismissing count four. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Superior Court for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

So ordered.


Summaries of

Aetna Casualty Surety v. State Park Ins. A.

Appeals Court of Massachusetts
Dec 8, 1981
428 N.E.2d 376 (Mass. App. Ct. 1981)
Case details for

Aetna Casualty Surety v. State Park Ins. A.

Case Details

Full title:AETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY vs. STATE PARK INSURANCE AGENCY, INC

Court:Appeals Court of Massachusetts

Date published: Dec 8, 1981

Citations

428 N.E.2d 376 (Mass. App. Ct. 1981)
12 Mass. App. Ct. 985

Citing Cases

Sacco's Three Sons Restaurant v. Prue

See also, Begelfer v. Najarian, 381 Mass. 177, 190-191 (1980). No thirty day demand letter is prerequisite to…

Damon v. Sun Co., Inc.

Indeed, the Massachusetts and federal courts have consistently respected the differences in procedures…