From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Aetna Cas. Sur. Co. of Hartford v. Gresham

Supreme Court of Florida
Jan 24, 1968
206 So. 2d 211 (Fla. 1968)

Opinion

No. 36614.

January 24, 1968.

Writ of Certiorari to the District Court of Appeal, Fourth District. 199 So.2d 790.

Donald L. Gattis, Jr., of Maguire, Voorhis Wells, Orlando, for petitioner.

Albert Yurko, Orlando, for respondent.


The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. After oral argument and upon further consideration, we have determined that the writ was improvidently issued. The writ must be and is discharged and the petition is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

THOMAS, ROBERTS, ERVIN and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

CALDWELL, C.J., dissents.


Summaries of

Aetna Cas. Sur. Co. of Hartford v. Gresham

Supreme Court of Florida
Jan 24, 1968
206 So. 2d 211 (Fla. 1968)
Case details for

Aetna Cas. Sur. Co. of Hartford v. Gresham

Case Details

Full title:AETNA CASUALTY SURETY COMPANY OF HARTFORD, CONNECTICUT, A CONNECTICUT…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Jan 24, 1968

Citations

206 So. 2d 211 (Fla. 1968)