From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Advanceme, Inc. v. Rapidpay, LLC

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Tyler Division
Nov 29, 2006
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:05cv424 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 29, 2006)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:05cv424.

November 29, 2006


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE


The above entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The Report of the Magistrate Judge, which contains his proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such action, has been presented for consideration (Doc. No. 142). The parties did not file any objections to the Report and Recommendations. The Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct. Therefore, the Court hereby adopts the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge as the findings of this Court.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED, under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 37 and 55, that Defendant Rapidpay, LLC, its officers, agents, servants, employees, and all persons and entities acting in concert with Rapidpay, or in participation with Rapidpay, be enjoined from making, using, selling, or offering for sale in the United States, or importing into the United States, any products and/or services that infringe, induce the infringement of, or contributorily infringe U.S. Patent No. 6,941,281 entitled "Automated Payment."

So ORDERED and SIGNED.


Summaries of

Advanceme, Inc. v. Rapidpay, LLC

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Tyler Division
Nov 29, 2006
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:05cv424 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 29, 2006)
Case details for

Advanceme, Inc. v. Rapidpay, LLC

Case Details

Full title:ADVANCEME, INC. Plaintiff, v. RAPIDPAY, LLC, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Tyler Division

Date published: Nov 29, 2006

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:05cv424 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 29, 2006)