From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Advanced Connection Tech., Inc. v. Canon U.S.A., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Mar 18, 2013
Case No. 3:12-cv-6496-MMC (N.D. Cal. Mar. 18, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 3:12-cv-6496-MMC

03-18-2013

ADVANCED CONNECTION TECHNOLOGY, INC., Plaintiff, v. CANON U.S.A, INC. Defendant

Daniel S. Mount, Esq. (Cal. Bar No. 77517) Kathryn G. Spelman, Esq. (Cal. Bar No. 154512) Jing H. Cherng, Esq. (Cal. Bar No. 265017) Mount, Spelman & Fingerman, P.C. RiverPark Tower, Suite 1650 Counsel for Advanced Connection Technology Inc. Martin L. Fineman (Cal. Bar. No. 104413) Davis Wright Tremaine LLP RALPH J. GABRIC (Pro Hac Vice ) TADASHI HORIE (Pro Hac Vice ) KORI ANNE BAGROWSKI (Pro Hac Vice ) BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONE


Daniel S. Mount, Esq. (Cal. Bar No. 77517)
Kathryn G. Spelman, Esq. (Cal. Bar No. 154512)
Jing H. Cherng, Esq. (Cal. Bar No. 265017)
Mount, Spelman & Fingerman, P.C.
RiverPark Tower, Suite 1650
Counsel for Advanced Connection Technology Inc. Martin L. Fineman (Cal. Bar. No. 104413)
Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
RALPH J. GABRIC (Pro Hac Vice)
TADASHI HORIE (Pro Hac Vice)
KORI ANNE BAGROWSKI (Pro Hac Vice)
BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONE

ORDER GRANTING


Stipulated Request to Extend Case Management

Deadlines Under Local Rule 6-2

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiff Advanced Connection Technology, Inc. ("ACT") and Defendant Canon U.S.A., Inc. ("Canon"), collectively, "the parties," enter into this stipulation based on the following facts:

1. ACT filed its complaints against Canon (D.I. 1, Case No. 3:12-06496-MMC), Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc. ("Toshiba") (D.I. 1, Case No. 5:12-cv-06489-PSG), and Hewlett-Packard Company ("HP") (D.I. 1, Case No. 3:12-cv-06487-JSC) on December 21, 2012.

2. On January 18, 2013, in anticipation of ACT's amended complaint, the parties stipulated to extend Canon's time to answer or otherwise respond to amended complaint to February 28, 2013. (D.I. 5.) The stipulation did not otherwise affect the existing deadlines set by the Court.

3. On January 21, 2013, ACT filed the amended complaint. (D.I. 6.)

4. On March 7, 2013, counsel for the parties met and conferred under Rule 26(f). In the course of this discussion the parties agreed that it would be beneficial to consolidate the claim construction procedures for all three cases. Because of the different procedural postures of the Canon, Toshiba, and HP cases, a continuance of the existing case deadlines would be appropriate to allow the cases to align procedurally.

Accordingly, the parties stipulate and respectfully request that the Court continue the initial case management conference to May 10, 2013. The parties anticipate that they will keep the Court apprised of further developments in the consolidation efforts.

Jing Hong Cherng

Mount, Spelman & Fingerman, P.C.

Counsel for Advanced Connection Technology Inc.

Tadashi Horie

Brinks Hofer Gilson & Lione

Davis Wright Tremaine LLP

Counsel for Canon U.S.A., Inc.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Further, the parties shall file a Joint Case Management Statement no later than May 3, 2013.

______________________

Hon. Maxine M. Chesney

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Advanced Connection Tech., Inc. v. Canon U.S.A., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Mar 18, 2013
Case No. 3:12-cv-6496-MMC (N.D. Cal. Mar. 18, 2013)
Case details for

Advanced Connection Tech., Inc. v. Canon U.S.A., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ADVANCED CONNECTION TECHNOLOGY, INC., Plaintiff, v. CANON U.S.A, INC…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Mar 18, 2013

Citations

Case No. 3:12-cv-6496-MMC (N.D. Cal. Mar. 18, 2013)