From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Advanced Alloys v. Sergeant S

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Jul 19, 1973
79 Misc. 2d 149 (N.Y. App. Term 1973)

Opinion

July 19, 1973

Appeal from the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County, CHARLES H. COHEN, J.

Ira L. Levinson for appellant.

Matthew F. Donohue and Joseph V. Hamilton, Jr., for Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A., respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

Order unanimously reversed, with $10 costs to abide the event, and motion for summary judgment denied.

While section 4-404 of the Uniform Commercial Code protects a bank which pays a stale check so long as it acts in good faith, it does not eliminate the requirement of ordinary care which a bank must observe in all its dealings ( Granite Equip. Leasing Corp. v. Hempstead Bank, 68 Misc.2d 350; see, also, Novak v. Greater N.Y. Sav. Bank, 30 N.Y.2d 136). In our opinion, there is an issue of fact as to whether, under all the circumstances, defendant Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A., acted with due care in this transaction. On a prior motion by the plaintiff, the defendant Chase Manhattan Bank urged that there were questions of fact requiring a full plenary trial.

Concur — GROAT, P.J., MARGETT and RINALDI, JJ.


Summaries of

Advanced Alloys v. Sergeant S

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Jul 19, 1973
79 Misc. 2d 149 (N.Y. App. Term 1973)
Case details for

Advanced Alloys v. Sergeant S

Case Details

Full title:ADVANCED ALLOYS, INC., Appellant, v. SERGEANT STEEL CORPORATION et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Jul 19, 1973

Citations

79 Misc. 2d 149 (N.Y. App. Term 1973)
360 N.Y.S.2d 142

Citing Cases

Five Towns Coll. v. Citibank

o some of these items, the prolonged lack of detection on the part of the plaintiff constituted "negligence…

Amsterdam Urban Renewal Agency v. McGrattan

In so ruling, we lastly note that section 4-404 of the Uniform Commercial Code upon which defendants rely and…