Opinion
21-12778
05-03-2022
SOLOMON ADU-BENIAKO, Plaintiff, v. CHERYL WYKOFF PENZON, MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS, PATRICK REIMANN, and DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION, Defendants.
Kimberly A. Altman Magistrate Judge
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANTS DEA AND REIMANN, AND REMANDING CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANTS LARA AND PEZON
DAVID M. LAWSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Presently before the Court is the report issued on April 12, 2022 by Magistrate Judge Kimberly G. Altman pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). The report recommends that the Court grant defendants Patrick Reimann's and the Drug Enforcement Administration's motion to dismiss the plaintiff's claims against them with prejudice; deny without prejudice defendants Cheryl Wykoff Pezon's and the Michigan Department of Regulatory Affairs's (LARA) motion to dismiss; and remand the plaintiff's claims against defendants Pezon and LARA to state court. The deadline for filing objections to the report has passed, and no objections have been filed. The parties' failure to file objections to the report and recommendation waives any further right to appeal. Smith v. Detroit Fed'n of Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987). Likewise, the failure to object to the magistrate judge's report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the matter. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). However, the Court agrees with the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the report and recommendation (ECF No. 18) is ADOPTED.
It is further ORDERED that the motion to dismiss by defendants Reimann and the DEA (ECF No. 9) is GRANTED, and the claims against them are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
It is further ORDERED that the motion to dismiss by defendants Pezon and LARA (ECF No. 10) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and the case is REMANDED to Oakland County, Michigan circuit court.