From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adside v. Stokes

United States District Court, Northern District of Florida
Jun 1, 2021
3:20cv5571/LAC/EMT (N.D. Fla. Jun. 1, 2021)

Opinion

3:20cv5571/LAC/EMT

06-01-2021

LAZARUS ADSIDE, Plaintiff, v. LIEUTENANT STOKES, Defendant.


ORDER

LACEY A. COLLIER, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

The chief magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on April 27, 2021 (ECF No. 19). Plaintiff was furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No. objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined it should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The chief magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 19) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), 1915A(b)(1);

3. The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this order and close the case.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Adside v. Stokes

United States District Court, Northern District of Florida
Jun 1, 2021
3:20cv5571/LAC/EMT (N.D. Fla. Jun. 1, 2021)
Case details for

Adside v. Stokes

Case Details

Full title:LAZARUS ADSIDE, Plaintiff, v. LIEUTENANT STOKES, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Florida

Date published: Jun 1, 2021

Citations

3:20cv5571/LAC/EMT (N.D. Fla. Jun. 1, 2021)