From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adriance v. Netschert

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jun 1, 1901
35 Misc. 817 (N.Y. App. Term 1901)

Opinion

June, 1901.

W.C. Findlay, for appellant.

J.P. O'Brien, for respondents.


The representations of plaintiff Adriance as to the condition of the water pipes and arrangements connected therewith, to prevent leakage, were independent of the lease itself and binding. The damages incurred in that behalf should have been allowed in the court below. Even had that been done, the plaintiffs were entitled to a judgment for the balance of their claim and interest, which should have been awarded to them, instead of a judgment for defendant as ordered.

Present: SCOTT, P.J., BEACH and FITZGERALD, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to abide event.


Summaries of

Adriance v. Netschert

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jun 1, 1901
35 Misc. 817 (N.Y. App. Term 1901)
Case details for

Adriance v. Netschert

Case Details

Full title:JAMES B. ADRIANCE et al., Respondents, v . FRANK NETSCHERT, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term

Date published: Jun 1, 1901

Citations

35 Misc. 817 (N.Y. App. Term 1901)