From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adriana M Castro, M.D., P.A. v. Sanofi Pasteur, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Aug 7, 2012
Civil Action No.: 11-7178 (JLL) (D.N.J. Aug. 7, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No.: 11-7178 (JLL)

08-07-2012

ADRIANA M CASTRO, M.D., P.A.; and SUGARTOWN PEDIATRICS, LLC; on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. SANOFI PASTEUR INC., Defendant.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION


ORDER

LINARES, District Judge.

Currently before the Court is a motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' First Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint filed by Defendant Sanofi Pasteur, Inc. For the reasons set forth in the Court's accompanying Opinion,

IT IS on this 6th day of August, 2012,

ORDERED that Defendant's motion to dismiss [CM/ECF No. 50] is DENIED in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________

Jose L. Linares

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Adriana M Castro, M.D., P.A. v. Sanofi Pasteur, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Aug 7, 2012
Civil Action No.: 11-7178 (JLL) (D.N.J. Aug. 7, 2012)
Case details for

Adriana M Castro, M.D., P.A. v. Sanofi Pasteur, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ADRIANA M CASTRO, M.D., P.A.; and SUGARTOWN PEDIATRICS, LLC; on behalf of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: Aug 7, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No.: 11-7178 (JLL) (D.N.J. Aug. 7, 2012)

Citing Cases

In re Remicade Antitrust Litig.

Yet it is the coercive threat of losing these rebates, under J & J's contract terms, that is the basis for…