From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adrian v. Williams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Oct 8, 2013
Civil Action No. 3:12-CV-2585 (M.D. Pa. Oct. 8, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:12-CV-2585

2013-10-08

JOEL ADRIAN, Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW PAUL WILLIAMS, FREELAND BOROUGH POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendants.


(Judge Brann)


(Magistrate Judge Blewitt)


ORDER

BACKGROUND:

The undersigned has given full and independent consideration to the September 4, 2013 report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Blewitt. ECF No. 23. No objections have been filed.

Because this Court agrees with Judge Blewitt's analysis the Court will not rehash the sound reasoning of the magistrate judge and will adopt the report and recommendation in its entirety.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. United States Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Blewitt's September 4, 2013 Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED in full. ECF No. 23.
2. Defendant's July 17, 2013 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as Moot. ECF No. 18.
3. The action is DISMISSED with prejudice.
4. The clerk is directed to close the case file.

____________________

Matthew W. Brann

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Adrian v. Williams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Oct 8, 2013
Civil Action No. 3:12-CV-2585 (M.D. Pa. Oct. 8, 2013)
Case details for

Adrian v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:JOEL ADRIAN, Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW PAUL WILLIAMS, FREELAND BOROUGH POLICE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Oct 8, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:12-CV-2585 (M.D. Pa. Oct. 8, 2013)

Citing Cases

Jackson v. Pa. State Univ.

This, in the Court's view, will tip the balance to granting Penn State's dismissal motion.See Walstrum v.…