Adrian v. Clark

1 Citing case

  1. Hal-Mar Dress Co. v. Clark

    165 F.2d 222 (Fed. Cir. 1947)   Cited 2 times
    In Hal-Mar Dress Co. v. Clark, 165 F.2d 222 decided to day, we hold that the Attorney General and not the Director of the Division of Liquidation succeeded to the Administrator's functions under the last paragraph of Section 205(e).

    Our reasons for reaching this conclusion will be stated. The two other cases are Korach Bros. v. Clark, 165 F.2d 218, and Adrian, Inc. v. Clark, Em.App., 165 F.2d 222. The last paragraph of Section 205(e), with which we are here concerned, provides that "The Administrator shall not institute or maintain any enforcement action under this subsection against any manufacturer of apparel items where the Administrator shall determine" that the conditions laid down in the section are present in the defendant's case.