From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adoma v. University of Phoenix, Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 16, 2010
NO. CIV. S-10-0059 LKK/GGH (E.D. Cal. Jul. 16, 2010)

Opinion

NO. CIV. S-10-0059 LKK/GGH.

July 16, 2010


ORDER


Plaintiffs have timely noticed a motion for class certification under Fed.R.Civ.P. 23 for hearing on August 9, 2010 — the same day on which the court will hear plaintiffs' motion for collective certification under the Fair Labor Standards Act. Defendants have filed an ex parte application to continue the hearing on the motion for class certification and thereby continue the deadline by which defendants must respond. (Dtk. No. 54). For the reasons stated in plaintiffs' opposition (Dkt. No. 55) the court DENIES the application.

Plaintiffs suggest that they would be willing to waive their right to file a reply, and thereby provide defendants with an additional week in which to oppose without postponing the hearing date. While this arrangement may work for the parties, it would not provide the court with sufficient time to review the papers in advance of the hearing. The court nonetheless EXTENDS the time in which defendants may oppose by two days: defendants' opposition may be filed no later than 5 p.m. on Wednesday, July 28, 2010. Plaintiffs may still file a reply no later than August 2, 2010.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Adoma v. University of Phoenix, Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 16, 2010
NO. CIV. S-10-0059 LKK/GGH (E.D. Cal. Jul. 16, 2010)
Case details for

Adoma v. University of Phoenix, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:DIANE ADOMA, Plaintiff, v. THE UNIVERSITY OF PHOENIX, INC., et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jul 16, 2010

Citations

NO. CIV. S-10-0059 LKK/GGH (E.D. Cal. Jul. 16, 2010)