From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Administrators Tulane Educational Fund v. Ortego

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Sep 20, 1985
475 So. 2d 764 (La. 1985)

Opinion

No. 85-C-1155.

September 20, 1985.

APPEAL FROM CIVIL DISTRICT COURT, ORLEANS PARISH, STATE OF LOUISIANA, HONORABLE RICHARD GARVEY, J.


Service of process was not valid under the Long Arm Statute. LSA-R.S. 13:3204 provides that a certified copy of the citation and the petition shall be sent to the defendant by registered or certified mail or actually delivered to the defendant. If mailed, the notice must be received by defendant or by a person authorized to receive mail on his behalf.

The librarian here had not been designated to receive mail for the defendant but merely sorted it for the school. Defendant, as far as the record reflects, did not receive the letter and was in fact not even in California when the mailing was received at the school. Compare Howard Avenue Realty Corporation v. McIntosh, 352 So.2d 348 (La.App. 4 Cir. 1978); Thomas Organ Company v. Universal Music Company, 261 So.2d 323 (La.App. 1 Cir. 1972).

The judgment of the court of appeal, 469 So.2d 1120, is reversed.

LEMMON, J., dissents.


Summaries of

Administrators Tulane Educational Fund v. Ortego

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Sep 20, 1985
475 So. 2d 764 (La. 1985)
Case details for

Administrators Tulane Educational Fund v. Ortego

Case Details

Full title:THE ADMINISTRATORS OF TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND v. WILLARD JAMES ORTEGO

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Sep 20, 1985

Citations

475 So. 2d 764 (La. 1985)

Citing Cases

Dukov v. 701 Corp.

Thus, we conclude that 701 Corporation took its default without complying with § 3205. This conclusion is…

Recreational Properties v. S.W. Mortg. Serv

Personal jurisdiction over a non-resident obtained by the use of the long arm statute will not attach if the…