From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Administrator v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 24, 1999
170 F.3d 870 (9th Cir. 1999)

Opinion

Nos. 96-71083, 97-70012

February 24, 1999

Petitions for Review of the Final Agency Action of the Environmental Protection Agency 61 Fed. Reg. 56,461 61 Fed. Reg. 56,450.

Before: GOODWIN, PREGERSON, and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

The order filed January 14, 1999, slip op. 367, modifying this court's prior opinion ( 151 F.3d 1205 (9th Cir. 1998)) is ORDERED WITHDRAWN.

The opinion filed August 10, 1998, slip op. 8705, and appearing at 151 F.3d 1205 (9th Cir. 1998) is amended as follows:

1. Slip op at 8717-18; 151 F.3d at 1211:

Delete final sentence of section III, "We need not, however,... surrounding four parcels."

Replace with the following:

"We therefore remand to EPA, without prejudice to the parties, to determine whether the parcels are reservations for purposes of 42 U.S.C. § 7474(c), if EPA re-promulgates its redesignation ruling in accordance with section V of this opinion. We note, however, that at least two of the four disputed parcels, Lower Verde and Montezuma Interchange, are adequately protected by virtue of their proximity to the Middle Verde parcel."

With the opinion thus amended, the Yavapai-Apache Tribe's petition for rehearing AND the Arizona Chamber of Commerce's petition for rehearing ARE DENIED.


Summaries of

Administrator v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 24, 1999
170 F.3d 870 (9th Cir. 1999)
Case details for

Administrator v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

Case Details

Full title:ADMINISTRATOR, STATE OF ARIZONA, AND JANE HULL, Governor, Petitioners, v…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Feb 24, 1999

Citations

170 F.3d 870 (9th Cir. 1999)