From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Admin. for Children's Servs. v. Kenyatta W. (In re Na'Ima W.)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 31, 2021
192 A.D.3d 1127 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)

Opinion

2019–12270 Docket No. N–31648–17

03-31-2021

In the MATTER OF NA'IMA W. (Anonymous). Administration for Children's Services, respondent; v. Kenyatta W. (Anonymous), appellant.

Lewis S. Calderon, Jamaica, NY, for appellant. James E. Johnson, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y. (Daniel Matza–Brown and Jessica Miller of counsel), for respondent. Janet E. Sabel, New York, N.Y. (Dawne A. Mitchell, Susan Clement, and Aurora Curtis of counsel), attorney for the child.


Lewis S. Calderon, Jamaica, NY, for appellant.

James E. Johnson, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y. (Daniel Matza–Brown and Jessica Miller of counsel), for respondent.

Janet E. Sabel, New York, N.Y. (Dawne A. Mitchell, Susan Clement, and Aurora Curtis of counsel), attorney for the child.

REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P., ROBERT J. MILLER, VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the father appeals from an order of fact-finding and disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Ben Darvil, Jr., J.), dated September 27, 2019. The order of fact-finding and disposition, insofar as appealed from, after a fact-finding hearing, found that the father neglected the subject child.

ORDERED that the order of fact-finding and disposition is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner commenced this proceeding against the father, alleging, inter alia, that he neglected the subject child by engaging in acts of domestic violence against the mother in the child's presence. Following a fact-finding hearing, the Family Court found that the father neglected the child. The father appeals.

"[A] party seeking to establish neglect must show, by a preponderance of the evidence, first, that a child's physical, mental or emotional condition has been impaired or is in imminent danger of becoming impaired and second, that the actual or threatened harm to the child is a consequence of the failure of the parent or caretaker to exercise a minimum degree of care in providing the child with proper supervision or guardianship" ( Nicholson v. Scoppetta, 3 N.Y.3d 357, 368, 787 N.Y.S.2d 196, 820 N.E.2d 840 [citation omitted]; see Family Ct Act § 1012[f][i][B] ; Matter of Anthony V. [Savas F.], 176 A.D.3d 1079, 1080, 111 N.Y.S.3d 320 ). "A single act of domestic violence in the presence of a child, or within the hearing of a child, may be sufficient for a neglect finding" ( Matter of Jihad H. [Fawaz H.], 151 A.D.3d 1063, 1064, 58 N.Y.S.3d 478 [citations omitted]; see Matter of Anthony V. [Savas F.], 176 A.D.3d at 1080, 111 N.Y.S.3d 320 ). "Great deference is given to the Family Court's credibility determinations, as it is in the best position to assess the credibility of the witnesses having had the opportunity to view the witnesses, hear the testimony, and observe their demeanor" ( Matter of Oliver A. [Oguis A.-D.], 167 A.D.3d 867, 868, 90 N.Y.S.3d 142 ; see Matter of Anthony V. [Savas F.], 176 A.D.3d at 1080, 111 N.Y.S.3d 320 ).

Here, the Family Court's finding that the father neglected the child by engaging in acts of domestic violence against the mother in the child's presence was supported by a preponderance of the evidence. The child was in imminent danger of physical impairment due to her close proximity to the violence (see Matter of John M.M. [Michael M.], 160 A.D.3d 646, 647–648, 73 N.Y.S.3d 232 ; Matter of Isabella S. [Robert T.], 154 A.D.3d 606, 606–607, 62 N.Y.S.3d 362 ). Furthermore, contrary to the father's contention, the court's determination concerning the mother's credibility is supported by the record and will not be disturbed on appeal (see Matter of Anthony V. [Savas F.], 176 A.D.3d at 1081, 111 N.Y.S.3d 320 ; Matter of Oliver A. [Oguis A.-D.], 167 A.D.3d at 868, 90 N.Y.S.3d 142 ).

The father's contention that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel is without merit (see Matter of Adam M.M. [Sophia M.], 179 A.D.3d 801, 802, 117 N.Y.S.3d 100 ; see Matter of Deanna E.R. [Latisha M.], 169 A.D.3d 691, 692, 93 N.Y.S.3d 375 ).

RIVERA, J.P., MILLER, BRATHWAITE NELSON and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Admin. for Children's Servs. v. Kenyatta W. (In re Na'Ima W.)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 31, 2021
192 A.D.3d 1127 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
Case details for

Admin. for Children's Servs. v. Kenyatta W. (In re Na'Ima W.)

Case Details

Full title:In the MATTER OF NA'IMA W. (Anonymous). Administration for Children's…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 31, 2021

Citations

192 A.D.3d 1127 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
192 A.D.3d 1127

Citing Cases

In re Melanie T.

The father appeals. " ‘[A] party seeking to establish neglect must show, by a preponderance of the evidence,…

Suffolk Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. Monica M. (In re Serena G.)

The mother appeals. "To establish neglect, the petitioner must demonstrate, by a preponderance of the…