From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Admin. for Children's Srvcs. v. Fausat O. (In re Michael O.F.)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Dec 26, 2012
101 A.D.3d 1121 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-12-26

In the Matter of MICHAEL O.F. (Anonymous). Administration for Children's Services, respondent; Fausat O. (Anonymous), appellant. (Proceeding No. 1) In the Matter of Joseph O.A. (Anonymous), Jr. Administration for Children's Services, respondent; Fausat O. (Anonymous), appellant. (Proceeding No. 2).

Fausat O. (Anonymous), Staten Island, N.Y., appellant pro se. Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y. (Kristin M. Helmers and Norman Corenthal of counsel), for respondent.


Fausat O. (Anonymous), Staten Island, N.Y., appellant pro se. Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y. (Kristin M. Helmers and Norman Corenthal of counsel), for respondent.
Steven Banks, New York, N.Y. (Tamara A. Steckler and Diane Pazar of counsel), attorney for the children.

In two related child neglect proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Richmond County (Wolff, J.), dated January 24, 2012, which directed the State Office of Children and Family Services or Lincoln Hall to notify the petitioner, Administration for Children's Services, when the child Joseph O.A. is released from its custody.

ORDERED that the appeal from the order is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as the appellant is not aggrieved thereby.

A person is aggrieved within the meaning of CPLR 5511 “when he or she asks for relief but that relief is denied in whole or in part,” or, when someone “asks for relief against him or her, which the person opposes, and the relief is granted in whole or in part” ( Mixon v. TBV, Inc., 76 A.D.3d 144, 156–157, 904 N.Y.S.2d 132 [emphasis omitted]; see Matter of Matthew L., 85 A.D.3d 917, 925 N.Y.S.2d 353;Mahmood v. Gutman, 81 A.D.3d 792, 916 N.Y.S.2d 802). Applying these principles to the matter before us, the appellant is not aggrieved by the order directing the State Office of Children and Family Services or Lincoln Hall to notify the petitioner, Administration for Children's Services, when the child Joseph O.A. is released from its custody, and, accordingly, her appeal must be dismissed.

ENG, P.J., ANGIOLILLO, SGROI and HINDS–RADIX, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Admin. for Children's Srvcs. v. Fausat O. (In re Michael O.F.)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Dec 26, 2012
101 A.D.3d 1121 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Admin. for Children's Srvcs. v. Fausat O. (In re Michael O.F.)

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MICHAEL O.F. (Anonymous). Administration for Children's…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 26, 2012

Citations

101 A.D.3d 1121 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 9062
955 N.Y.S.2d 895

Citing Cases

Saccheri v. Cathedral Props. Corp.

"A person is aggrieved within the meaning of CPLR 5511 when he or she asks for relief but that relief is…

Kone v. Martin

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as the appellant is not aggrieved by…