From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Admin. for Children's Servs. v. Faith J. (In re Kayla C.)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Feb 14, 2019
169 A.D.3d 495 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

8388

02-14-2019

IN RE KAYLA C., and Others, Dependent Children Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Administration for Children's Services, Petitioner–Appellant, v. Faith J., et al., Respondents–Respondents.

Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (Carolyn Walther of counsel), for appellant. Law Offices of Elisa Barnes, New York (Elisa Barnes of counsel), for Faith J., respondent. Law Office of Thomas R. Villecco, P.C., Jericho (Thomas R. Villecco of counsel), for Stephanie C., respondent. Larry S. Bachner, New York, attorney for the child Kayla C. Dawne A. Mitchell, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Marcia Egger of counsel), attorney for the children McKenzie G., Melanie G., Kylie D. and Christian D.


Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (Carolyn Walther of counsel), for appellant.

Law Offices of Elisa Barnes, New York (Elisa Barnes of counsel), for Faith J., respondent.

Law Office of Thomas R. Villecco, P.C., Jericho (Thomas R. Villecco of counsel), for Stephanie C., respondent.

Larry S. Bachner, New York, attorney for the child Kayla C.

Dawne A. Mitchell, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Marcia Egger of counsel), attorney for the children McKenzie G., Melanie G., Kylie D. and Christian D.

Renwick, J.P., Manzanet–Daniels, Oing, Moulton, JJ.

Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Alma M. Gomez, J.), entered on or about August 9, 2017, which granted respondents mothers unsupervised visitation with their respective children under certain conditions, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The Family Court's determination to grant these two mothers unsupervised visitation with their respective children, subject to compliance with precautionary measures specifically tailored to protect the children from harm, should not be disturbed as the orders have a sound and substantial basis in the record (see Matter of Arcenia K. v. Lamiek C., 144 A.D.3d 610, 610, 42 N.Y.S.3d 124 [1st Dept. 2016] ; Linda R. v. Ari Z., 71 A.D.3d 465, 465–466, 895 N.Y.S.2d 412 [1st Dept. 2010] ). There is no evidence in record that either of the mothers had perpetrated the sexual abuse or posed any other safety risk to the children. In addition, the court took specific precautions to prevent endangering the children by prohibiting other people from being present during the visits, requiring that the visits take place in the community, prohibiting the children from being left with anyone other than their mothers during the visits, and limiting visitation to twice weekly for a three hours a visit (see Matter of Anthony M.P. v. Ta–Mirra J.H., 125 A.D.3d 868, 868–69, 4 N.Y.S.3d 117 [2d Dept. 2015] ).


Summaries of

Admin. for Children's Servs. v. Faith J. (In re Kayla C.)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Feb 14, 2019
169 A.D.3d 495 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

Admin. for Children's Servs. v. Faith J. (In re Kayla C.)

Case Details

Full title:In re Kayla C., and Others, Dependent Children Under the Age of Eighteen…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Feb 14, 2019

Citations

169 A.D.3d 495 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 1138
92 N.Y.S.3d 627