From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adler v. Lizan, Triangle Jewelry Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1927
220 App. Div. 779 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)

Opinion

May, 1927.


Order denying motion to vacate notice of examination before trial affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. We think the subjects mentioned in the notice are matters concerning which the burden of proof rests with the plaintiff to maintain his action. While the use in the notice of the word "concerning," in referring to the various subjects, renders the scope of the examination somewhat indefinite, that is a matter which may be properly controlled and limited by the judge before whom the examination is held. Kelly, P.J., Young, Kapper, Lazansky and Hagarty, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Adler v. Lizan, Triangle Jewelry Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1927
220 App. Div. 779 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)
Case details for

Adler v. Lizan, Triangle Jewelry Co., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ABRAHAM ADLER, Respondent, v. SAMUEL LIZAN and TRIANGLE JEWELRY CO., INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 1, 1927

Citations

220 App. Div. 779 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)