From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adler v. BP Expl. & Prod., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Sep 1, 2020
CIV. ACT. NO. 1:19-cv-79-TFM-N (S.D. Ala. Sep. 1, 2020)

Opinion

CIV. ACT. NO. 1:19-cv-79-TFM-N

09-01-2020

EDWARD JOSEPH ADLER, III, Plaintiff, v. BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION, INC., et al. Defendants.


JUDGMENT

In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion and Order (Doc. 31) entered on September 1, 2020, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice.

The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. This case is hereby closed.

DONE and ORDERED this 1st day of September 2020.

/s/ Terry F. Moorer

TERRY F. MOORER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Adler v. BP Expl. & Prod., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Sep 1, 2020
CIV. ACT. NO. 1:19-cv-79-TFM-N (S.D. Ala. Sep. 1, 2020)
Case details for

Adler v. BP Expl. & Prod., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD JOSEPH ADLER, III, Plaintiff, v. BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION, INC.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 1, 2020

Citations

CIV. ACT. NO. 1:19-cv-79-TFM-N (S.D. Ala. Sep. 1, 2020)

Citing Cases

King v. BP Expl. & Prod.

“Under the terms of the MSA, the following need not be proven in litigation: (1) the fact or existence of…

Dailey v. BP Expl. & Prod.

“Under the terms of the MSA, the following need not be proven in litigation: (1) the fact or existence of…