From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adler v. Adler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 15, 1996
224 A.D.2d 282 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Summary

affirming entry of QDRO to enforce money judgments for attorney's fees incurred by plaintiff in attempt to compel defendant's compliance with child support obligations contained in settlement agreement incorporated but not merged into parties' divorce judgment

Summary of this case from Silverman v. Spiro

Opinion

February 15, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Kristin Booth Glen, J.).


The IAS Court properly entered a Qualified Domestic Relations Order to aid enforcement of two money judgments for attorneys' fees incurred in plaintiff's numerous attempts to compel defendant's compliance with his child support obligations contained in a settlement agreement incorporated but not merged into the parties' divorce judgment ( see, e.g., Adler v. Adler, 203 A.D.2d 81; 176 A.D.2d 162). Since awards of attorneys' fees were authorized under Domestic Relations Law §§ 237 and 238 and "relate[d] to the provision of child support", the Qualified Domestic Relations Order in issue clearly falls within the definitional requirements of the Internal Revenue Code an the Employee Retirement Income Security Act ( 26 U.S.C. § 414 [p] [1] [B] [i]; 29 U.S.C. § 1056 [d] [3] [B] [ii] [I]; CPLR 5205 [c] [4]).

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Wallach, Ross, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

Adler v. Adler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 15, 1996
224 A.D.2d 282 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

affirming entry of QDRO to enforce money judgments for attorney's fees incurred by plaintiff in attempt to compel defendant's compliance with child support obligations contained in settlement agreement incorporated but not merged into parties' divorce judgment

Summary of this case from Silverman v. Spiro

In Adler v. Adler, 224 A.D.2d 282, 638 N.Y.S.2d 29 (1st Dept.1996), the court held that the trial court had properly entered a QDRO to aid in enforcement of money judgments for attorneys related to compliance with support orders.

Summary of this case from M.M. v. T.M.

In Adler v. Adler, 224 A.D.2d 282, 638 N.Y.S.2d 29 (1st Dept.1996), the court held that the trial court had properly entered a QDRO to aid in enforcement of money judgments for attorneys related to compliance with support orders.

Summary of this case from M.M. v. T.M.

In Adler v. Adler, 224 AD2d 282 (1st Dept. 1996), the court held that the trial court had properly entered a QDRO to aid in enforcement of money judgments for attorneys related to compliance with support orders.

Summary of this case from M.M. v. T.M.
Case details for

Adler v. Adler

Case Details

Full title:JANE R. ADLER, Respondent, v. JOEL A. ADLER, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 15, 1996

Citations

224 A.D.2d 282 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
638 N.Y.S.2d 29

Citing Cases

Lundon v. Lundon

The Supreme Court also should have granted that branch of the defendant's motion which was for a QDRO…

York v. York

We disagree. Defaults in support and maintenance obligations may be enforced by QDROs against pension fund…