From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adler, et al., v. Saffran

Supreme Court of Florida. En Banc
Jun 24, 1941
3 So. 2d 364 (Fla. 1941)

Opinion

Opinion Filed June 24, 1941 Rehearing Denied July 19, 1941

A Writ of Error from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Ross Williams, Judge.

Marshall F. Sanders, for Plaintiffs in Error.

A.C. Franks, for Defendant in Error.


This case is before us on writ of error to a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, defendant in error here, in the sum of $2500.00

The suit was for damages alleged to have been caused by an assault and battery. There is ample evidence in the record to sustain the conclusion evidently reached by the jury that the defendant pushed or shoved the plaintiff, causing her to fall whereby her arm was broken and her shoulder dislocated.

The evidence is sufficient to show such conduct on the part of the defendant resulting in such injury to the plaintiff as would make the defendant liable to plaintiff in damages for the injury sustained.

In the case of Pandula v. Fonseca, 145 Fla. 395, 199 So. 358, we affirmed the judgment in the sum of $3500.00 for damages resulting from assault and battery and, while the injury suffered in the instant case was not as severe as that which was shown to have been suffered in the Pandula case, we cannot say that the verdict and judgment are so excessive as to require a remittitur or reversal of the judgment. See also Winn Lovett Grocery Co. v. Archer, 126 Fla. 308, 171 So. 214.

The judgment, therefore, stands affirmed.

BROWN, C. J., WHITFIELD, TERRELL, CHAPMAN, THOMAS and ADAMS, J. J., concur.


Summaries of

Adler, et al., v. Saffran

Supreme Court of Florida. En Banc
Jun 24, 1941
3 So. 2d 364 (Fla. 1941)
Case details for

Adler, et al., v. Saffran

Case Details

Full title:DORIS ADLER, joined by her husband and next friend, JOSEPH ADLER v. NELLY…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida. En Banc

Date published: Jun 24, 1941

Citations

3 So. 2d 364 (Fla. 1941)
3 So. 2d 364

Citing Cases

Miami Transit Company v. Yellen

The court properly instructed the jury that provocation could not be shown to bar the action, but could be…

Diamond v. Rice

Affirmed. See Adler v. Saffran, 147 Fla. 549, 3 So.2d 364; Glickstein v. Setzer, Fla. 1955, 78 So.2d 374.…