From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adler Consulting v. Executive Life

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 18, 1986
483 So. 2d 501 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

Opinion

No. 85-1193.

February 18, 1986.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, James Henderson, J.

Robert A. Shupack and Joy A. Bartmon, Hollywood, for appellants.

Wicker, Smith, Blomqvist, Tutan, O'Hara, McCoy, Graham Lane and Shelley H. Leinicke, Miami, for appellees.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and JORGENSON, JJ.


A competitor has no standing to enforce the licensing provisions of the statutes of this state. See 53 C.J.S., Licenses § 6 p. 466; Compare Mercer v. Hemmings, 194 So.2d 579, 583 (Fla. 1966).

A contract terminable "at will" cannot be the subject of tortious interference where said interference is lawful competition. Unistar Corporation v. Child, 415 So.2d 733 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Wackenhut Corporation v. Maimone, 389 So.2d 656 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); Lake Gateway Motor Inn, Inc. v. Matt's Sunshine Gift Shops, Inc., 361 So.2d 769 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978). Therefore we find no error in the summary judgment under review and affirm.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Adler Consulting v. Executive Life

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 18, 1986
483 So. 2d 501 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)
Case details for

Adler Consulting v. Executive Life

Case Details

Full title:ADLER CONSULTING CORPORATION, A FLORIDA CORPORATION AND ELLIOTT ADLER…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Feb 18, 1986

Citations

483 So. 2d 501 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

Citing Cases

Jones v. Sterile Products Corp.

Such a process on its face does not lend itself to the required elements for the tort of tortious…