From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adkins v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Feb 4, 1992
823 S.W.2d 164 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

No. 59795.

February 4, 1992.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT, CITY OF ST. LOUIS; EDWARD M. PEEK, JUDGE.

David Bruns, St. Louis, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Joan F. Edwards, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.


ORDER


Movant, Quintin Adkins, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the transcript of the guilty plea and the legal file and find no error on the part of the trial court. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties here involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.


Summaries of

Adkins v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Feb 4, 1992
823 S.W.2d 164 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

Adkins v. State

Case Details

Full title:QUINTIN ADKINS, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Feb 4, 1992

Citations

823 S.W.2d 164 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992)