Opinion
Case No. SC05-81.
November 1, 2005.
Lower Tribunal No. 4D04-4225.
Because petitioner has failed to show a clear legal right to the reinstatement of her certiorari petition in the district court, she is not entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is hereby denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000) (stating that in order to be entitled to a writ of mandamus, petitioner must show that he or she has a clear legal right to performance of the requested act, that the respondent has an indisputable legal duty to perform that act, and that no other adequate remedy exists). "Petitioner's Motion for an Order of Clarification" is denied.
WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS, QUINCE and BELL, JJ., concur.