From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adkins v. Kernan

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 15, 2022
2:19-CV-0458-DAD-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 15, 2022)

Opinion

2:19-CV-0458-DAD-DMC-P

11-15-2022

DUPREE LAMONT ADKINS, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT KERNAN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

DENNIS M. COTA, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion, ECF No. 63, for disqualification of the California Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney General, as counsel for Defendants. Plaintiff's motion is conclusory, baseless, and fails to establish grounds for disqualification of counsel. Plaintiff's motion is, therefore, denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Adkins v. Kernan

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 15, 2022
2:19-CV-0458-DAD-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 15, 2022)
Case details for

Adkins v. Kernan

Case Details

Full title:DUPREE LAMONT ADKINS, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT KERNAN, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 15, 2022

Citations

2:19-CV-0458-DAD-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 15, 2022)