From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adkins v. Gomez

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Aug 27, 2021
No. 21-6313 (4th Cir. Aug. 27, 2021)

Opinion

21-6313

08-27-2021

ALFRED BRADLEY ADKINS, Petitioner - Appellant, v. CHRISTOPHER GOMEZ, Warden, Respondent - Appellee.

Alfred Bradley Adkins, Appellant Pro Se. Erin K. Reisenweber, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Submitted: August 24, 2021

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:19-cv-00112-GMG)

Alfred Bradley Adkins, Appellant Pro Se.

Erin K. Reisenweber, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Alfred Bradley Adkins, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation to grant Respondent's dispositive motion and deny relief on Adkins' 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Adkins v. Gomez, No. 3:19-cv-00112-GMG (N.D. W.Va. Feb. 4, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Adkins v. Gomez

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Aug 27, 2021
No. 21-6313 (4th Cir. Aug. 27, 2021)
Case details for

Adkins v. Gomez

Case Details

Full title:ALFRED BRADLEY ADKINS, Petitioner - Appellant, v. CHRISTOPHER GOMEZ…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Aug 27, 2021

Citations

No. 21-6313 (4th Cir. Aug. 27, 2021)