From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adkins v. Carey

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 23, 2006
No. CIV S-05-1501 RRB PAN P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 23, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV S-05-1501 RRB PAN P.

February 23, 2006


ORDER


Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding through counsel with an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On November 2, 2005, respondents filed a motion to dismiss. On December 7, 2005, petitioner filed an opposition to the motion.

In the motion, respondents contend that petitioner has no federally protected liberty interest in parole under California law. To support that contention, respondent relies on an order of the district court in Sass v. California Board of Prison Terms, 376 F.Supp.2d 975 (E.D.Cal. 2005). The Sass case is set for oral argument in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on March 16, 2006. Good cause appearing, respondents' motion will be denied without prejudice to its renewal, as appropriate, not later than thirty days after any decision by the court of appeals in Sass.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondents' November 2, 2005 motion to dismiss is denied without prejudice.


Summaries of

Adkins v. Carey

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 23, 2006
No. CIV S-05-1501 RRB PAN P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 23, 2006)
Case details for

Adkins v. Carey

Case Details

Full title:BENJAMIN ADKINS, Petitioner, v. TOM CAREY, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 23, 2006

Citations

No. CIV S-05-1501 RRB PAN P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 23, 2006)