From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adkins v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Jan 9, 2013
Civil Action 2:12-cv-484 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 9, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action 2:12-cv-484

01-09-2013

KEITH ADKINS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.


Judge Marbley

Magistrate Judge King


ORDER

On December 5, 2012, the United States Magistrate Judge recommended that the parties' joint motion for voluntary remand, Doc. No. 19, be granted. Report and Recommendation, Doc. No. 20. Although the parties were advised of their right to object to the recommendation, there has been no objection.

The Report and Recommendation, Doc. No. 20, is ADOPTED AND AFFIRMED. The decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is REVERSED pursuant to Sentence 4 of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and the matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner for a new hearing and a new decision, with instructions to the administrative law judge to further evaluate at Step 2 the severity of plaintiff's depression and to consider evidence submitted to the Appeals Council after the administrative law judge's decision.

_________________________

Algenon L. Marbley

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Adkins v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Jan 9, 2013
Civil Action 2:12-cv-484 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 9, 2013)
Case details for

Adkins v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:KEITH ADKINS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 9, 2013

Citations

Civil Action 2:12-cv-484 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 9, 2013)