Opinion
1
DEREK BROWN, Applicant v. SNOOZE HOLDINGS, INC. ; EMPLOYERS ASSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants No. ADJ10954369 Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board State of California August 18, 2023San Deigo District Office
OPINION AND DECISION AFTER RECONSIDERATION
KATHERINE A. ZALEWSKI, CHAIR
It has come to the attention of the Appeals Board that, while this matter has been pending on reconsideration, the parties have reached a proposed settlement.
Since the District Office is precluded from acting on a case while it is pending on reconsideration (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 8, § 10961), in order to permit review by the workers' compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) of the proposed settlement, we will rescind the decision from which reconsideration is sought and return this matter to the trial level for the WCJ to consider the proposed settlement. If the WCJ does not approve the settlement, the WCJ may issue an order reinstating the original decision and any aggrieved person may timely seek reconsideration from the reinstated decision. This is not a final decision on the merits of any of the issues pending on reconsideration.
Commissioner Lowe, who was on the panel that issued a prior decision in this matter is unavailable to participate further in this decision. Another panel member was assigned in her place.
2
For the foregoing reasons,
IT IS ORDERED as the Decision After Reconsideration of the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board that the WCJ's decision of March 22, 2022 is RESCINDED and this matter is RETURNED to the trial level for further proceedings and decision by the WCJ.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD
I CONCUR, JOSE H. RAZO, COMMISSIONER, KATHERINE WILLIAMS DODD, COMMISSIONER