From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adeyola v. Reddy

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Jan 5, 2022
1:21-CV-886 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 5, 2022)

Opinion

1:21-CV-886

01-05-2022

UMAR ADEYOLA, Plaintiff, v. DR. EDAVALLY REDDY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and the Clerk served the Recommendation on the plaintiff. The Magistrate Judge found that venue is more appropriate in the Eastern District of North Carolina and recommended transfer to that district. The plaintiff filed a motion seeking assistance in obtaining counsel, see Docs. 7, 8, but he did not object to the Recommendation. No further review of the complaint, including review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, was or has been undertaken. After consideration of the record, the Court hereby adopts the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation.

It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this action be transferred to the Eastern District of North Carolina.


Summaries of

Adeyola v. Reddy

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Jan 5, 2022
1:21-CV-886 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 5, 2022)
Case details for

Adeyola v. Reddy

Case Details

Full title:UMAR ADEYOLA, Plaintiff, v. DR. EDAVALLY REDDY, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina

Date published: Jan 5, 2022

Citations

1:21-CV-886 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 5, 2022)