Opinion
11106-21S
08-18-2023
ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
Kathleen Kerrigan, Chief Judge.
On May 10, 2022, respondent filed a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction on the ground that the Petition was not filed within the time prescribed by the Internal Revenue Code (I.R.C.). Although the Court directed petitioner to file an objection, if any, to respondent's Motion to Dismiss, petitioner failed to do so. The record establishes that the Petition was not timely filed. See I.R.C. §§ 6213(a) and 7502; Pugsley v. Commissioner, 749 F.2d 691 (11th Cir. 1985); Hallmark Rsch. Collective v. Commissioner, No. 21284-21, 159 T.C. (Nov. 29, 2022); see also Allen v. Commissioner, 2022 WL 17825934 (11th Cir. 2022).
Upon due consideration, it is
ORDERED that respondent's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction is granted, and this case is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.