Summary
dismissing pro se civil rights action for failure to prosecute under Rule 41[b] in part because "[o]ver three years has passed since this litigation was commenced, well past the eighteen months envisioned by Congress when the Civil Justice Reform Act of 1990 was instituted"
Summary of this case from Sidney v. CaronOpinion
9:03-CV-0032 (GLS/RFT).
September 13, 2006
JACK W. ADELMAN, Plaintiff, Pro Se, North Bay, New York, for Plaintiff.
GORMAN, WASZKIEWICZ, BARTLE J. GORMAN, ESQ., LAW FIRM, Utica, New York, for Defendant.
ORDER
The above-captioned matter comes before this court following a Report-Recommendation issued by Magistrate Judge Randolf F. Treece on August 3, 2006. See Dkt. No. 66. Despite the passage of ten days, no objections have been filed. Having reviewed the Report-Recommendation for clear error, see Almonte v. N.Y. State Div. of Parole, 9:04-CV-484, 2006 WL 149049 (N.D.N.Y. Jan. 18, 2006), and finding none, the court adopts Judge Treece's Report-Recommendation in its entirety.
WHEREFORE, it is hereby
ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation filed on August 3, 2006 is ACCEPTED in its entirety for the reasons stated therein, and it is further
ORDERED, that defendants' motion to dismiss ( Dkt. No. 54) is GRANTED, and it is further
ORDERED, that plaintiff's amended complaint ( Dkt. No. 20) is DISMISSED in its entirety, and it is further
ORDERED, that the Clerk of the Court provide a copy of this Order to the parties by regular mail.